class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Criminal Liability for Document Shredding after Arthur Anderson LLP

Documents are destroyed every day in the ordinary course of business. Relying in part of the Supreme Court's decision in Arthur Anderson LLP v. United States, the authors argue that document destruction is not an inherently wrongful activity and that impeding a federal investigation is likewise sometime morally and legally permissible. They conclude that scienter requirements clarified in existing federal decisional law should be explicitly applied to future criminal cases involving document destruction.

Albert D. Spaulding, Jr. and Mary Ashby Morrison, 43 Am. Bus. L.J. 647 (Winter 2006)

 

 

sort entries by:
author | date | title | category



Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.